Before you read this post, I have to offer a disclaimer so that you won't think I'm any crazier than you already do. Or perhaps so that you won't think I'm newly crazy... Anyway, several months ago I began having trouble with Blogger (again) and have been unable to correct the issue. I'm tired of taking hours to get out a post (or days) and have it still not be correct. So, I'm just posting this the way it is; perhaps someone will be able to help me correct it. (I do know some HTML 5/CSS 3) The issue is the font; if you notice, in some places it's sentence case while in others it's all uppercase. I didn't do that, when I wrote it everything was in sentence case. When I hit Preview though, it all changed....
************************************************************************************
Well hallelujah, democracy lives! I won't say 'justice', because we haven't seen that yet, but I'm praying for it! Especially in this case, where they have it on videotape that the man was running away from the police officer after a traffic stop and the officer pulled his gun and shot the man in the back, then placed a Taser by his dead body. His claim was that he was in fear for his life because the man running from him
might have turned around and charged the officer!!!
"Slager testified that even at 18 feet away, Scott still posed a threat to him and could have turned around and charged him."
So he didn't shoot because the man was turning around, fumbling at his waistband, yelling threats, none of the usual dumb excuses; he shot because he thought the man who was obviously so scared that he was running away might turn around (at 18 feet away) and charge him. Meaning the man might run back the 18 yards he'd gained and attack the officer. If he was scared enough to run in the first place, why does this guy think we're going to believe that he thought the runner might turn around and come back? Nah, don't wash with me officer, no way. You shot him because he was 18 feet away already and gaining ground with every step, and you couldn't let it be said that you lost him because he outran you, so you took him down. (Of course that's JMHO)
Here's the story for you to read yourselves.
Walter Scott Cop To Be Retried for Murder in 2017
Ex-officer Michael
Slager will again face a state jury trial for shooting Scott in the back
beginning on March 1.
BY: The Root Staff
POSTED: December 30, 2017
|
Michael Slager testifies at his trial for killing of Walter Scott |
The
former North Charleston, South Carolina police officer charged in the murder of
motorist Walter Scott will be retried on March 1, 2017, reports CNN.
Although
Slager was caught lying about the April 4, 2015, encounter, in which video
captures him shooting Scott several times in the back and placing his Taser
near Scott’s body, the jury failed to reach a guilty verdict after four
days and more than 24 hours of deliberation.Of the 12 jurors, 11 black and one
white, one juror, in a note, said he couldn’t vote for a conviction and
wouldn’t change his mind, despite the fact that the judge on the case allowed
the jury to consider a lesser offense of voluntary manslaughter. Prosecutors
charge that Scott, a father of four, ran after Slager stopped his car for a
broken taillight because he feared going to jail for unpaid child support. They
assert that Slager pursued and killed Scott even though his life was not in
danger.
|
Slain father of four, Walter Scott |
An emotional Slager
testified that even at 18 feet away, Scott still posed a threat to him and
could have turned around and charged him.
If convicted of
either charge, Slager faces 30 years to life in prison.
Additionally,
Slager is being tried in federal court on May 1, 2017, according to CBS
News. In the federal case, Slager is charged with violating Scott’s
rights under the color of law, lying to investigators and using a
firearm in a violent crime. For those charges, he faces a term of life in prison.
Read more at CNN and CBS News.
No comments:
Post a Comment